Review: 2013 Nissan Altima

2013 Nissan Altima Sedan

It seems like ages ago, but in the not too distant past, Nissan had virtually no presence in the mainstream family sedan market. Stuck between the strong selling Sentra and high-end Maxima was the forgettable Nissan Stanza, a car that failed to resonate with buyers. Meanwhile, the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry had already established themselves as the cars to beat. Twenty years ago, Nissan had enough, and introduced the Altima, a legitimate player with a lot to prove. How the times have changed. 2013 marks the introduction of a new, fifth generation Altima, which is currently Nissan’s best-selling car, and one of the best selling cars in the USA.

Taking a look at the Altima’s sheetmetal, it’s clear Nissan went conservative with the redesign. Yes, it’s curvy, even elegant at some angles, and with ample chrome trim it is apparent a more upscale look was desired. The Altima is pleasant to look at, and offends no one. And that works for the huge audience the Altima appeals to. The tradeoff is a completely forgettable car. It’s sort of like listening to Micheal Buble. Yes, he has a fantastic voice, sings the American Standards as good as anyone, and I enjoy his music while I’m listening to it. But if I’m not exposed to his music, I’m not thinking about it. I’m not replaying his songs in my head, or dying to hear his song again. So it is with the Altima. Nice enough to look at, classy enough to show your neighbors, but leaves absolutely no lasting impression at all.

2013 Nissan Altima Sedan

The Garage reviewed the fourth generation Altima in 2010, and we had no qualms about the interior. The new design inside is warmer, more inviting, and more thoughtful than the old car, which is good considering you’ll be spending the bulk of your time inside than out. It’s clear Nissan spent a lot of energy designing a thoughtful, easy to live with, and easy to use cabin. Even our feature laden test car’s controls were simple and intuitive. Comfortable and roomy, the Altima strikes all the right notes. While some critics have moaned about rear seat room, the reality is the Altima has all the room the average family could possibly need. In sum, the Altima’s interior is just right for a trip to the grocery store or a long distance drive.

In the engine room, the Altima offers updated versions of its previous engines. The base engine is a 2.5L four, rated at 182hp. Although some of the Altima’s competition has abandoned the option of a V-6, the Accord and Camry continue to offer one, and so does the Altima. Here, a 3.5L V-6 makes 270hp. Both engines are paired to an updated CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission). No manual is offered. While our last time  out with an Altima had the powerful V-6, this time around we had the four cylinder, which makes sense-it is estimated 90% of all Altimas sold have the four. Which I am pleased to say is quite a refined engine, and for this car, and the typical Altima buyer, is all they really need. However, the Altima has a few feathers in its cap worth mentioning when equipped with the four. Nissan claims 0-60mph in 7.1 seconds, which is plenty quick for a four cylinder in this size. But, when you take in consideration the car’s EPA ratings of 27/38 MPG city/highway, the results are impressive. That sprint to 60 was once the territory of Porsche 944′s and Mazda RX-7′s. Now it’s a family sedan that can sip 38 MPG on the highway.

Yes, it is Nissan’s XTronic CVT that helps make it all happen. And the numbers look great, but mash the pedal to the carpet, and the buzz-killing engine drone sucks all the fun out of the equation. Again, another reality check is needed here. Most Altima owners are not going to floor it. They will drive gently through town, merge seamlessly into highway traffic, and likely never push the engine hard enough to even notice the ‘motorboat’ effect that is the curse of the CVT. And I would be fine with that, but the trouble is, the Altima’s handling is absolutely superb. Steering, brakes, chassis, the whole package is, well, exemplary for this class of car. Put a six-speed manual in this car and the Altima becomes quite the package for the family man with a knack for driving fun. Sadly, the vast majority of Altima owners will never appreciate just how well this car can handle.

2013 Nissan Altima SedanThe Altima is available as a sedan or coupe, but the coupe is a continuation of the fourth generation car. The four cylinder sedan is offered in Base, S, SV, or SL trim. Our car was the 2.5 SV, the most popular Altima. With a base price of $24,100USD, standard equipment is generous. All 2.5 Altima SV’s come standard with 17″ alloys, power driver’s seat, SiriusXM satellite radio, Bluetooth, RearView monitor, dual zone auto climate control, iPod integration, push button start and chrome exhaust tips. Our test car added the Convenience Package (moonroof, auto dimming rearview mirror with HomeLink, fog lights, and LED turn indicators), floor mats, and navigation. All in, our Altima totaled $27,005, including destination. Overall, a competitive price for a car with sought after features, but nothing that is remarkable.

With the fifth generation Altima, you get a clear sense of what Nissan wanted. To their exterior/interior designers, the message must have been “Listen, we have a good thing going here, let’s not take any risks and screw this up.” And that leaves us with a pretty vanilla car, judging by appearance only. Yet, to the engineers, a different message: “The last Altima was good. Make it better.” The beauty of the Altima lies within it. The engineers were let loose to make the impossible possible. An extremely efficient car that can seat five, sprint from 0-60mph in just a click over seven seconds, and deliver 38MPG. All in supreme comfort with all the amenities of a modern luxury car. The magic of the Altima is not what you see, but what you feel.

There is a glimmer of hope for us enthusiasts. Nissan has prepared an Altima for the Australian V8 Supercar race series. The chassis is so well sorted it deserves to be raced. Surely, an Altima SR could be in the works. For that matter, a NISMO Altima? Take the V-6 with a hot cam and a reprogrammed ECU with a manual, and Nissan has a bargain-priced Audi S4. NISMO, Nissan, are you listening?

Nissan Prices New Sentra

You’d be forgiven if you thought that Nissan had forgotten about the Sentra. The Garage sampled a 2012 Sentra SR earlier this year, and found it to be competent, but a design that lacked excitement, and worse, was really showing its age. For 2013, Nissan has taken the wraps off the seventh generation, all-new Sentra. For such an important car, Nissan has been extremely low-key about the launch of the newest Sentra.

While the outgoing Sentra looked hopelessly outdated, the new car is a breathe of fresh air with a level of grace and sophistication never before seen on the normally pedestrian Sentra’s of yore. The new Sentra is also 5% lighter than the outgoing car, yet is larger with more interior space while delivering better fuel economy. All Sentra’s share the same 1.8L four cylinder, rated at 130hp. Overall fuel economy is 34MPG.

The 2013 Nissan Sentra S starts at $15,990USD with a six-speed manual transmission (all other Sentra’s have a CVT). Nissan is offering seven variants of the Sentra, which seems like overkill between S, SV, SR, and SL trims along with an FE+ fuel economy trim level to further confuse matters. The top-spec Sentra SL tops out at a still reasonable $19,760. Keeping up with the latest in-car tech is a must, and Nissan will offer the Sentra with NissanConnectSM with Navigation, Hands-Free Text Messaging Assistant, Point of Interest GPS powered by Google, and Pandora radio. Other available features include a rear view monitor, premium Bose audio, and dual-zone auto climate control.

The latest Sentra is by far the prettiest and most advanced yet, and it’s handsome lines will surely lead buyers to the dealer’s door when it becomes available mid-October, 2012. Why Nissan is keeping so quiet about one of the most enduring models in its line is a mystery to me, but we bid adieu to the old, archaic Sentra, and welcome the new model. Be sure to check in for a full review of the 2013 Nissan Sentra in the coming months!

Review: 2012 Nissan Armada

When I was asked what car I was currently reviewing, I replied it was the Nissan Armada. The question that followed was “Oh, what do you think of it?” As someone who talks about cars in paragraphs, not short sentences, I paused, and replied “Well, it’s like a Chevy Tahoe, except made by Nissan.” That may upset fans of the Bowtie, or perhaps maybe even Nissan. But the reality is the Armada and Tahoe compete head to head in a shrinking market for full-size, truck-based SUVs, so the comparison is inevitable. After living with a Tahoe for a week last December and an Armada this past July, the similarities and differences became clear.

The Nissan Armada as we know it is no spring chicken. Introduced as a 2004 model, in today’s automotive arena the Armada is ancient. In its favor, the styling of full-size SUVs moves at a glacial pace, so in spite of its eight year old design, it still manages to look current. In spite of its size, the Armada is quite understated compared to the stern, serious face of the Tahoe. Chunky 20″ alloys and enough, but not excessive use of chrome trim lent just enough elegance to justify the price of admission. Our test car, finished in Galaxy Black did an excellent job of masking the Armada’s most glaring design flaw. From the side profile, the roof of the passenger cabin rises and swoops downward, where it is met by the cargo area, where the roof is flat. In brighter colors, it looks like two different design committees designed the Armada, and never met to compare notes for a cohesive design.

Inside, the Armada offers the level of quality and ease of use we’ve come to expect from Nissan. All controls are simple to use and easy to understand. Seats front and rear offered plenty of room and were quite comfortable. Our Armada was capable of seating up to eight, although the top-spec model with second row captain’s chairs drops that number to seven. What I appreciated about the Armada was the amount of interior storage and cubbies available, whereas the Tahoe seemed lacking. While some complain the Armada offers less cargo room, I’ll counter with this. If you to want access that extra cargo space in the Tahoe, you’ll have to physically remove the third row seat to get to all of it. The Armada? Press a button, and the third row seat simply folds flat. I’ll take the latter option, thank you. To sum, the cabin of the Armada seems far more family friendly.

Just as the Tahoe is based on the Silverado pick-up truck, the Armada is based upon Nissan’s top-dog truck, the Titan. All Armada’s are powered by a 5.6L V-8 pumping out 317hp, mated to a five-speed automatic. Buyers have the choice between rear wheel and all-wheel drive. Our test car was a 4×2, with EPA fuel economy estimated at 13/19 MPG city/highway. In mixed driving, our Armada’s trip computer was showing an average of 14 MPG, so she is one thirsty girl. In a 4×4 Armada, expect about a 1 MPG drop. Towing capacity in our Armada is an impressive 8,200 lbs, while a 4×4 can tow up to 9,100 lbs. Acceleration from the V-8 is strong, and makes the right sounds, and is without doubt more refined than the Tahoe’s mill. Despite its size and weight, the Armada is very easy to drive and wiggle your way through town or highway traffic. Yes, it handles like a truck, because, well, it is, but that is not to say it lacks refinement or is at all crude. If you expect the creaminess of a Nissan Murano, you’re missing the point.

The Armada is available in three trim levels: SV, SL, and Platinum. Our test car was the mid-level SL. While I was thankful for being spared the bling of the chrome 20′s on the Platinum, I was incredulous that if you want navigation on your Armada, you must choose the top-spec car. Standard on our SL was a leather interior, power, heated front seats, 11 speaker Bose audio, XM Radio, Bluetooth, rear sonar, rear view monitor, dual zone and rear auto climate controls, and power rear liftgate. Options on our Armada included a rear DVD entertainment system, replete with wireless headphones, remote control and 8″ screen, and power moonroof. Including destination, our Armada carried an MSRP of $48,965USD. Hardly cheap, but the price is on par for full-size, well equipped SUVs. Still, the lack of navigation, even at this price just seemed wrong.

So when asked about the Armada, equating it to the Tahoe was the simple answer, but as you’ve seen, it is far more complex. Appearance is subjective, but I’d have the say the Tahoe is by far more handsome. It epitomizes the look you want from an SUV of this size. On the other hand, the interior of the Armada was much more family friendly. Comparing how they drive, the Armada felt more nimble. But as always is the case in the car business, it’s the sales that matter. By the end of July,  2012, for every Armada Nissan sold, Chevy sold nearly four Tahoes. In spite of this, I would say these two trucks are evenly matched enough they merit comparison shopping. So before you drop that check off at your Chevy dealer, you may want to make a detour to Nissan first.

If you do, to quote the Rolling Stones, just ‘Paint It Black”.

Review: 2012 Nissan Versa

Bank. Money. If you have ever tuned into Food Network’s ‘Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives’ in the US, this is how host Guy Fieri describes a successful recipe he’s sampled. It’s good, and as a restaurateur himself, he knows it’s profitable. Rewind the clock back to April of 2011, where yours truly, along with our Founding Editor Gary Grant stood for the global reveal of the all-new 2012 Nissan Versa sedan. It’s no secret the automotive press has been excited about the new interest in sub-compacts, but the sort of plain Jane image of the Versa has left us a little cold. And Nissan is fine with that. Why? The Versa is the best-selling car in its class, that’s why.

Even with a light show and pounding techno beats from the 2011 New York International Auto Show as the Versa was shown to us, it was tough to muster up any excitement. Now off the stage and in the real world, it was time to sample, and live with the Versa for a week. The Versa comes off as sort of narrow and top-heavy, and the skinny, high sidewall tires do nothing to add here. Thankfully our test car was the top-spec SL, which at least added chrome trim, body colored side-view mirrors, fog lights and 15″ alloys. Finished in a subdued Sandstone metallic, our Versa may have looked slightly oddly proportioned, but did not look at all out of place on Main Street in the wealthy town of  Litchfield, CT among the chic shops and restaurants.

If the exterior of the Versa is a tad less graceful than the competition, there is a reason. The interior. Inside, the Versa offers an incredible amount of space. Other subcompacts like the Mazda2 and Ford Fiesta have nothing on the Versa for interior room, especially in the rear seat. The amount of room in the rear has no peer in this class of car. Up front, there was more than enough room as well. Seats were cushy with little in the way of lateral support. All controls were intuitive to use, and easy to read. Icing on the cake was a positively enormous trunk.

The 2012 Nissan Versa sedan is powered by a 1.6L four cylinder rated at 109hp. Only the base model is offered with a five-speed manual, while all other trim levels come with a Continuously Variable Transmission. As an automotive enthusiast, I despise CVTs, but Nissan is fully committed to the CVT, and as awful as they are, I concede that Nissan builds the best of the lot. No, the Versa is not quick, and as we toured the curvy roads of Litchfield County the Versa was struggling a bit. At highway speeds the Versa was completely comfortable, but passing takes some planning. With EPA fuel economy figures of 30/38 MPG city/highway, it is fuel economy that matters most over performance.

Yet even sticking to country back roads with tight corners and elevation changes, the Versa kept its cool. The steering was numb, the suspension soft, but the car never felt sloppy, and while not going slow, my wife and son never complained.

The Nissan Versa is one of the cheapest cars for sale in the US, with a base MSRP of $10,990. Our top-spec SL added the previously described features, as well as Bluetooth, audio steering wheel controls, iPod controls, trip computer, full power accessories, remote keyless entry, and cruise control. Options on our test car included floor and trunk mats, and the Tech Package, which added GPS Navigation, a 5″ color touch screen and XM Satellite Radio. Including destination charges, our Versa came in at a reasonable $17,190USD. That’s a good amount of of kit for what Nissan is charging.

It may not be sexy or most fun to drive in its segment, but Nissan owns the subcompact car segment in America. And to quote the blonde-bleached spiked hair Food Network persona Guy Fieri, that is money.

Review: 2012 Nissan Maxima

It may be hard to believe, but the Maxima has been carrying the mantel as Nissan’s premium sedan for 31 years. While that first generation Maxima bowed our after the 1984 model year, it’s interesting to note it was the first and only Maxima to have rear wheel drive. And the Maxima’s of the day were fine cars indeed, but when the third generation Maxima arrived in 1989, it carried a small sticker in the rear window, reading ’4DSC’. Four door sports car. The car was a revelation at the time-European sport sedan performance but at a much more attainable level.

But it’s not 1989, and much has changed in the sport sedan world since then. So it was time to meet the current Maxima, which Nissan continues to bill as ‘The 4-Door Sports Car’. Is the Maxima still deserving of that title? Read on to find out.

The current Maxima has been around since 2009, but a mild refresh was done for the 2010 model year. I have never been a fan of the blunt-faced front end grill treatment, which is neither sporty, elegant or aggressive, just unattractive. Otherwise, the Maxima presents itself well with sporty, distinctive headlamp bezels, and the chromed dual exhaust hints at the performance under the hood. The Maxima is well executed with the exception of the grill, but unfortunately is sort of forgettable.

The interior of the Maxima is an extremely pleasing place to spend time, with a bright cabin highlighted by very high quality materials that were both pleasing to the touch and to the eyes. Despite a raft of high-end tech features, the Maxima’s controls were intuitive and easy to use. Exceptionally comfortable seats front and rear with plenty of room for all, I would have no reservations in recommending the Maxima for a comfortable highway cruiser.

The Maxima is offered with one drivetrain only, a 3.5L V-6 rated at 290hp, paired to a CVT (continuously variable transmission), and of course, since 1985, driven through the front wheels. And this is where I have trouble with the notion of the Maxima being called a four door sports car. Out of any automaker out there, I will credit Nissan for building what are arguably the best CVT’s available, but to an enthusiast, it literally sucks all the fun out. As recently as 2006, you could order a Maxima with a six-speed manual, but those days are long gone and do not look like they will ever return. The Maxima is quick and pulls hard, but keep your hands on the wheel, as there is some torque steer under hard acceleration. Otherwise, the car is well composed with a very comfortable ride.

The 2012 Maxima is available in either base S or SV trim. Our test car was the SV, which carried a base price of $34,450USD. For that, you get 18″ wheels, power seats, leather interior, Bose audio, XM satellite radio, Bluetooth, dual-zone auto climate control, push button start, power moonroof, and LED fog lights. Our test car included the Premium Package (dual-panel moonroof, rear power sunshade, xenon headlights, heated seats, power tilt/telescoping steering wheel, rear bucket seats, USB port), rear spoiler, and Premium Technology Package (Navigation, XM Traffic/XM Weather). Including delivery, our Maxima rang in at $40,930. Yes, it was optioned out to the hilt with a host of premium features, but even so, when people asked me about the cost of the car, $40,000 seemed to turn off everyone I talked about paying that much for a Maxima.

There was a time when the lines between the Altima and Maxima were so blurred, I couldn’t make sense of why the Maxima was still around. Nissan has wisely moved the Maxima upmarket, but with the upcoming 2013 Altima, Nissan has also moved its best seller upmarket as well. You may think I have an axe to grind with the Maxima, but in reality, I don’t. It does everything it is asked to do, and very well. My only complaint is Nissan lost the right to call this a 4-Door Sports Car when they yanked a six-speed manual in favor of a CVT. As such, I think Nissan should face reality and recognize the Maxima’s competition with cars like the Buick LaCrosse and Lexus ES350. Nissan diehards, do not despair. Your company still builds a four door sports car. It’s called the Infiniti G37.

Auto Express pits Nissan Juke R against GT-R on track

There are few things cooler than a real skunkworks concept car. Essentially that means a bunch of car manufacturer’s engineers go underground and build their ultimate version of a road car, often without the knowledge of their superiors. Such was the case with the Nissan Juke R, which was mated with a GT-R to create the most ungodly crossover known to motoring kind.

Since the unveiling, there are few cars that auto journos have wanted to drive. The good folks at Auto Express have managed to get an afternoon with the matte black beastie and put it to the test against Godzilla. The track time battle is surprisingly close and you can see it after the break.

[Read more...]

Review: 2012 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SR

The Sentra has been a pillar of Nissan’s car line for a full thirty years now, and while times have certainly changed, the Sentra has unfailingly been the automotive equivalent to sensible shoes or the same favorite brand of jeans you pick year after year. In other words, with the Sentra, the perception is you get just about what you expect. But the reality is we no longer live in a world where your choices for a decent small car were essentially limited to Civic/Corolla/Sentra. Far from it. With that in mind, The Garage set out to see how the current Sentra stacks up.

The Sentra is now in its sixth generation. Introduced in 2006 in Detroit as a 2007 model, the Sentra is now ancient in a sea of brand-new, fresh-faced competition. To put this into perspective, when the current Sentra was shown to the world for the first time, my wife was pregnant with our son. Said son is now in Kindergarten learning how to read, about to turn six years old. But, I digress. The Sentra is certainly familiar in appearance for having been around so long. A styling refresh in 2010 did much to soften up the blocky Lego-like front and rear end design. Our test car was a Sentra SR with the Special Edition Package identical to the car pictured here. For sure, I appreciated the SR-specific exterior features such as side sill extensions, sportier front and rear fascias, decklid spoiler among other features. But again, you’re looking at a design that has been around for an eternity. The sporty appearance bits help, but cannot mask the age of the design.

Given the sporty bits on the Sentra’s exterior, those expecting that theme to carryover inside will walk away bitterly disappointed. Our test car was finished in a pale, industrial grey that just seemed to shout ‘rental car’. The Sentra offers a perfectly functional, practical cabin, however. As a tall fellow I had more than enough room up front. Gauges were clear as a bell, and all other controls were a snap to use. But I was frequently annoyed with a squeaking driver’s seat on our 2012 test car with all of 6,000 miles on the clock. I was also disappointed at the lack of heated seats-they can be had on a Sentra, but only the top-spec SL model. The cabin is showing its age much moreso than the exterior, but again, the biggest letdown was the Sentra SR’s sporty exterior styling revealing a drab, dull, and completely uninspired interior.

With the exception of the SE-R and Spec V Sentra’s, all models share the same 2.0L four cylinder rated at 140hp. With this engine, only the base Sentra can be had with a manual transmission, all other models share a CVT. Acceleration felt about average for this class of car, and EPA fuel economy ratings of 27/34  city/highway MPG are OK but well behind the numbers a Hyundai Elantra can achieve. On a cold January weekend here in Connecticut, the Sentra seemed to take forever for its engine temp to warm up. Cruising at 35mph with the engine, which is no model of silky smoothness itself but at a constant buzzy 2,000 rpm the Sentra was annoying as all heck until she finally warmed up enough. Once warmed up, the Sentra still felt far less refined than its newer competition, in terms of ride quality and overall refinement.

The 2012 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SR has a base list price of $17,990USD, which includes the exterior bits described earlier, foglights, six-speaker audio with iPod interface. Our test car added splash guards, floor mats, and the Special Edition Package that included Navigation, XM Satellite radio, XM NavTraffic, USB port, keyless entry and ignition, Bluetooth, moonroof and unique 16″ alloys. Total tally, including destination comes to $20, 320. That is a pretty decent amount of features for the price paid here.

The Sentra represents a decent value for the amount of features you get, but in the end this is a dated, tired car that has outlived its useful life. The bottom line is that in the intervening years the Sentra has been around, the competition has seriously stepped up its game. To be sure, the Sentra will do all that is asked of it-reliable, economical transportation. And the market has spoken-in 2011, the Sentra was Nissan’s second best-selling car in the US behind the Altima. In my opinion, newer models like the Ford Focus, Chevy Cruze, Hyundai Elantra and Mazda3 simply offer a far more engaging driving experience and refinement the Sentra cannot match. Value is one thing, but in a market as hotly contested as this, resting on your laurels simply won’t do in 2012.

Review: 2011 Nissan Quest

Here at The Garage, we don’t often review minivans, which is sort of ironic considering myself and Founding Editor Gary Grant are both parents. In my case, with only one kid to haul around, a minivan might seem like overkill but when the opportunity arose to review the all-new Nissan Quest, we were eager to see Nissan’s latest entry in the minivan market. The Quest first debuted in 1993, and with the 2011 model, is now in its fourth generation.

First impressions on viewing the Quest was that this is one huge vehicle, but I was stunned to find the car is actually 4″ shorter than the 3rd generation Quest. I typically take time to read other reviews of car I have tested, and was surprised that comments about the exterior styling were generally positive. Yes, any minivan is all about utility, but in looking at the Quest, it looks as if two groups of designers did the front and rear of the car, and never once met until it was time to build the car. While the nose is handsome enough, going back the Quest is a slab-sided bread box. And it isn’t just me. Anyone I came across who saw the Quest remarked how much they disliked the styling, moreso than any vehicle I have ever reviewed.

Thankfully, inside it is a different story entirely. The Quest is tastefully executed. The quality of materials, fit and finish cannot be faulted. Our top=spec LE test car was fully loaded with every creature comfort imaginable. Yet with all the gadgets, all the controls were intuitive and easy to use. One dislike was when the shifter in Drive, my view of some center stack controls were obscured. On a clear November day, we set out to tony Newport, Rhode Island in search of fine food and a tour of the mansions from the Gilded Age. The navigation was a no-brainer, the 13 speaker Bose audio system with satellite radio provided all the tunes we needed and in good quality as well. Our son welcomed the built-in sunshades for privacy.

All Quests share the same drivetrain. Namely, a 3.5L V-6 good for 260hp, paired to a continuously variable transmission. All Quests are front wheel drive only. Despite its size and weight, the Quest has no problem getting around. We cruised at a steady 80mph on our way to Rhode Island and the Quest was as cool as a cucumber. I’m still no convert to the CVT, but I really have no complaints about Nissan’s application here. Steering is feather-light, as I expected, but handling was quite composed, more than I had expected. In sum, the Quest was a pretty competent road tripper that had no problem moving at a good clip.

The Quest does fall short by quite a good margin when it comes to overall cargo capacity to its closest rivals, namely the Honda Odyssey, Toyota Sienna and Chrysler Town & Country. And it doesn’t help that they all are better looking cars. Our test car was the top-spec LE model, which included nearly every conceivable feature you could want in a minivan. Our son delighted in the 11″ screen to watch ‘Scooby Doo’ on DVD while we enjoyed our own music on XM Radio with the Bose audio.  In terms of interior comfort, we could not have asked for more. Optioned with dual moonroofs, floor mats and cargo net, our Quest totaled $43,740USD including delivery.

Boasting a fine driving experience, and comfortable cabin, the Quest is a fine car to drive, but I feel it is let down by its incoherent styling and sub-par cargo capacity.

Pathfinder Concept shows new direction for Nissan

Since 1986, the Nissan Pathfinder has been a leader in the SUV category, blending style, utility and reasonable value that appealed to many consumers. Each generation of the Pathy has been a clear descendant of the previous model. Until now that is. The “concept” that Nissan is showing at Detroit is a drastic departure from the historic two box shape that has always defined the truck.

One of the keys to Pathfinder’s success has always been that it was, first and foremost, a truck. A body on frame constructed truck that was capable of doing real work while also being comfy and looking sharp. The new unit will be a unibody construction, essentially turning the Pathy into a very large crossover.

For some consumers, boxy may not be good, as Volvo learned by staying with the box for too many years before becoming sexy. The new Pathfinder is certainly sexy and may just draw a whole new segment of buyers into the showroom. Let’s just hope they don’t lose the ever important utility part of the equation by moving away from the tried and true truck platform.

Photo gallery and Nissan press release after the break.
[Read more...]

Nissan Looking to Trim Models?

In an article from Automotive News, an organization that caters to automotive media and industry types, reported that Nissan chief Carlos Ghosn has hopes of raising Nissan market share here in North America, but not by adding models for greater appeal, but by possibly scrapping some. He did not name any models, but the bottom line as I heard it was looking for overlap, and weeding out undesirable cars. Which got me thinking-what Nissan cars could be at risk? And what are their chances of survival?

Pathfinder

It’s hard to believe, I know. The Pathfinder was huge for Nissan, and a significant player in the SUV market throughout the 1990′s. But that was when the SUV reigned supreme. Buyer’s preferences have shifted, however. Realizing that off-roading is an unlikely venture, buyers have migrated to the more car-like crossover, and the proof is in the numbers. For every Pathfinder Nissan sells, more than two Muranos go out the dealer’s doors. Considering the current Pathfinder has been with us since 2005, the vehicle is practically ancient, and seemingly forgotten by Nissan. That lack of development is a troubling sign that Nissan may be on the fence of the future of the Pathfinder.

Xterra

The Xterra is just as old as the current Pathfinder-the last time a new model was introduced was in 2005. So, once again we have a relic residing in the Nissan line, with no news of an upcoming replacement. It’s also the slowest selling SUV/CUV in Nissan’s line. But the Xterra sits on the same platform as the Frontier and Titan, which makes it cheaper to keep on going.  While a slow seller for the brand, the Xterra gives Nissan some street cred for being a legit old school SUV capable of doing off-road duty. Given its ties to Nissan’s trucks, and the rugged image it provides the brand, I stand to reason that the Xterra’s future may not be guaranteed, but the reasons for keeping it around outweigh forgo scrapping it.

Maxima

Like the Pathfinder, the Maxima is a long-time member of the Nissan family, and it’s hard to imagine not having it around. But the Altima has taken the place as Nissan’s mainstream mid-size sedan, easily outselling it by a 2:1 margin. Given the raging success of the Altima, I’m left a bit confused of where the Maxima fits in Nissan’s portfolio. While the Altima dukes it out with the Ford Fusion and Toyota Camry, does the Maxima go head on with their larger cars, namely the Taurus and Avalon? The message from Nissan is blurred, since it continues to market it as a ‘four door sports car’, a tag that fit years ago. But today, with front-wheel drive and a boring CVT transmission, the Maxima hardly comes off as to what I’d consider to be an honest sports sedan today.

Nissan airs a TV commercial where a guy awakes to find his wife is expecting a baby. He then stands in the driveway, gazing longingly at his Nissan 370Z. He then ‘pulls’ the car, transforming it into a Maxima. Let’s be real. If I owned a 370Z and needed a car with a back seat, and did not want to give up on performance, Nissan already builds that car, and it is not the Maxima. It’s called the Infiniti G37. Rear or all-wheel drive? Option of a manual tranny or a 7-speed automatic? The G37 is the obvious choice. If Nissan wants to continue with the Maxima, it needs to seriously rethink just who they are targeting.

cube

The cube is a tough one to figure out. We sampled one, and generally came away impressed. But I’m an automotive journalist who tends to like something new and different, and the cube does just that. While I applaud the cube for its individuality, it is the market that ultimately speaks. The notion of a small, boxy utility vehicle is a distinctly Asian innovation that did get some traction in the North American marketplace. But Honda has abandoned the Element, and the once popular Scion xB has seen its sales dwindle. The Kia Soul enjoys a good level of success, and is highly promoted by Kia with their catchy hamster TV commercials. In comparison, Nissan does little to promote the cube. Despite its lack of sales volume, Nissan indicated they remain committed to keeping the cube in the current product line, for now at least.

Murano CrossCabriolet

Again, a vehicle that really leaves us scratching our heads. The Murano CrossCabriolet, the first convertible crossover looks like an answer to a question no one ever asked. While The Garage has yet to sample one, the automotive media has bashed the car in reviews. While I’m all for niche marketing, this car just goes to an extreme that I simply cannot rationalize. If Nissan wanted to add a drop top to its line, I feel their money would have been much better spent on taking the Altima Coupe and turning that into a convertible, not to mention filling the void when Toyota cancelled the Solara coupe and convertible.

Mr. Ghosn’s remarks struck me as quite interesting, not because Nissan is not selling well, but because they are. As a whole, Nissan is a fairly successful car company. In the small sedan market, the Versa completely dominates. Nissan is on a roll with the Altima, selling over 222,000 cars in the US by the end of October, an increase of 18% from a year ago. The Rogue and Murano crossovers are also sales successes. But in the hyper-competitive car business, there is always room for improvement, and I can see where Mr. Ghosn is thinking of the ‘less is more’ concept. What vehicles remain is unknown, but it is definitely food for thought.