<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carnival of Cars: Edition #17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegarageblog.com/garage/carnival-of-cars-edition-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegarageblog.com/garage/carnival-of-cars-edition-17/</link>
	<description>The Garage: Your daily dose of automotive news, reviews and motorsports coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:17:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://thegarageblog.com/garage/carnival-of-cars-edition-17/comment-page-1/#comment-6414</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegarageblog.com/garage/carnival-of-cars-edition-17/#comment-6414</guid>
		<description>True man true!

Maybe it&#039;s time to axe the big C! As a model line, the brand has been irrelevant for years anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True man true!</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s time to axe the big C! As a model line, the brand has been irrelevant for years anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leroy Brown</title>
		<link>http://thegarageblog.com/garage/carnival-of-cars-edition-17/comment-page-1/#comment-6410</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegarageblog.com/garage/carnival-of-cars-edition-17/#comment-6410</guid>
		<description>Good point about the Caravan having a stronger brand than the T&amp;C - it may have been better to axe the T&amp;C.  The reason I didn&#039;t is because without hte T&amp;C, the Chrysler lineup would be in pretty sad shape.  Dodge can work without a minivan ( I think ), but Chrysler in it&#039;s current state can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about the Caravan having a stronger brand than the T&amp;C &#8211; it may have been better to axe the T&amp;C.  The reason I didn&#8217;t is because without hte T&amp;C, the Chrysler lineup would be in pretty sad shape.  Dodge can work without a minivan ( I think ), but Chrysler in it&#8217;s current state can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
